What is your experience as an affiliate marketer of eLeavers or StudAds?
As an affiliate marketer, my experience with eLeavers and StudAds has been largely positive and profitable when approached with the right strategy. Both platforms offer unique advantages that can be valuable depending on the goals of your campaign.
With eLeavers, I found the process of setting up campaigns to be simple and straightforward. The platform is very affiliate-friendly, especially for those promoting offers from ClickBank, JVZoo, or CPA networks. I appreciated the ability to directly link to affiliate products, which saved time and made campaign setup much faster compared to networks like Google Ads that restrict such practices. When I carefully selected my targeting options and created compelling ad copies, I saw real, high-quality clicks that resulted in leads and conversions. Overall, my experience with eLeavers as an affiliate marketer was profitable and satisfying, particularly for niches like health, finance, and digital education.
On the other hand, StudAds also proved useful but for different reasons. StudAds allowed me to drive a high volume of low-cost traffic to my offers, which worked well for building mailing lists and generating awareness for new products. While the conversion rates were lower compared to eLeavers, the sheer number of visitors made certain campaigns profitable — especially when promoting free offers, lead magnets, or simple opt-in pages. For brand awareness and bulk traffic testing, StudAds was an effective tool in my affiliate marketing strategy.
In summary, both eLeavers and StudAds contributed to profitable campaigns in my experience. eLeavers delivered more focused and conversion-friendly traffic ideal for affiliate sales, while StudAds provided affordable reach for volume-based campaigns. As an affiliate marketer, knowing when and how to use each platform was the key to turning their traffic into real results.
